Draft of CIty of Mobile Resolution

We are working to have our Bay communities join together to pass this sample resolution.  Attached is the draft of the Mobile City Resolution presented on July 23, 2013.





WHEREAS, the City of Mobile is committed to the protection of its citizens  and the natural resources on which the City depends, including but not limited to: its land resources; its source of drinking water at Big Creek Lake; and its marine and aquatic resources  including Mobile Harbor, Mobile River, Mobile Bay, the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, and the other rivers and tributaries passing through and adjacent to Mobile; and

WHEREAS, the tar sands in Alberta, Canada, are a combination of clay, sand, water, and bitumen that are open pit mined in the boreal forests of Alberta, Canada and processed to extract the oil-rich bitumen; diluted with lighter crude oils, naptha, or natural gas condensate for transportation; and transported via pipeline, truck, or rail to refineries where it is refined into an extra heavy crude oil; and

WHEREAS, nationwide, in the last three years, there have been two major pipeline ruptures and an unreported number of minor ruptures of pipelines carrying tar sands diluted bitumen; and

WHEREAS, the July 2010 pipeline rupture in Marshall, Michigan resulted in a spill estimated to be more than 819,000 gallons of tar sands diluted bitumen  that contaminated 35 miles of the Kalamazoo River and Morrow Lake. As of March 14, 2013 the spill has not been fully cleaned-up. The EPA has ordered dredging in sections of the river and in Morrow Lake Delta. The total clean-up cost reached $809 million in 2012 and is increasing, more than any non-ocean spill on record; and

WHEREAS, the March 2013 pipeline rupture in Mayflower, Arkansas spilled more than an estimated 280,000 gallons of tar sands diluted bitumen and  has resulted in the evacuation of approximately 22 homes; and

WHEREAS, on July 6, 2013, a train carrying crude oil derailed in Lac Megantic, Quebec killing over 40 people, destroying thirty buildings, and requiring the evacuation of over 1,000 people; and

WHEREAS, the spills occurred on pipelines that had carried non-tar sands diluted bitumen for years, but had not been specifically designed, designated, or permitted to carry tar sands diluted bitumen; and

WHEREAS, tar sands diluted bitumen is heavier than water and is diluted with solvents to decrease the viscosity  allowing it to flow through a pipeline;

WHEREAS, the diluting agent may separate from tar sands diluted bitumen in the event of a spill in which case the bitumen will sink quickly to the bottom causing more long term damage and making it very difficult and more expensive to clean up than other lighter crude oils; and

WHEREAS, techniques for cleaning-up tar sands diluted bitumen in marine and aquatic environments are still not fully developed and are experimental and difficult; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Ten Mile - Pascagoula pipeline runs through four miles of the Big Creek Lake watershed, (source of drinking water for Mobile, Mobile County, Prichard, Semmes, and Spanish Fort), is within 3,000 feet of Big Creek  Lake, and  crosses 128 streams and wetlands along the route, terminating at the Chevron Refinery in Pascagoula, MS; and
WHEREAS, Tar Sands diluted bitumen ­­­­­­is currently being shipped into Mobile via the Canadian National Railroad, loaded onto trucks in Saraland at the Arc Saraland facility, transported across the Africa Town – Cochran Bridge to the Arc Blakely terminal where it is transferred into storage tanks, and transferred for the third time into inland and ocean-going barges; the numerous transfers greatly increasing the chances of a spill, and 
WHEREAS there are plans published by Arc Terminals, LP to expand their storage facilities on the east bank of the Mobile River, build a railcar trans-loading and storage facility directly behind the GM&O building, and build two pipelines under the Mobile River connecting the facilities on the east bank with the facilities in downtown Mobile.  It is anticipated that this infrastructure will connect to either the existing pipeline owned by Plains All American that runs from Chickasaw to the nexus of the pipeline being built to Pascagoula at the Ten-Mile Storage Facility, or to a new pipeline built through Prichard, Chickasaw, and the Eight-mile community, thereby creating a more economic method to transport material mined from the tar sands in Alberta, Canada from Mobile to the Chevron refinery and ensuring that the health and safety of the citizens and natural resources of the Mobile area must shoulder the unacceptable long term risk of an explosion or catastrophic spill; 
­­­NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Council of the City of Mobile, whose pledge is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens, strongly opposes the transporting by pipeline of any substance within the watershed of Big Creek Lake that may represent a risk to the public drinking water supply; and to the transporting and storage of tar sands diluted bitumen,  in proximity to Mobile’s  natural resources, specifically Big Creek Lake, Mobile River, Mobile-Tensaw Delta, and Mobile Bay upon which the city depends; and 
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council supports the creation of clear Federal and State guidelines for tracking the chemical composition of pipeline transported fuels so that local governments, citizens, and first responders can better understand, and plan for, the risks associated with the specific type of fuel flowing through or to their communities; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council transmit a copy of this Resolution to Alabama’s Congressional delegation, Gov. Robert Bentley, Alabama State House and Senate leadership, the U.S. State Department, President of the United States, Managing Partner of Plains All American Pipeline, LP, Managing Member of Plains Southcap, L.L.C., Managing Partner of Arc Terminals, LP, Managing Partner of Arc Terminals GP, LLC, Managing Partner of Lightfoot Capital Partners LP, and the Canadian Consulate in Boston.

Monday, July 22 ACTION NOTICE

Today's action is to congregate at the Mobile Area Water Service  at 1:00 on Moffatt Rd.
We will be a peaceful group asking our officials to do what is right. Bring signs, bring your neighbors, carpool if you can. We must show them we care about this issue!

Endangered Species Report for Pipeline

PlainsPipeline-T&E Species List[1Nov2012]

PlainsPipeline-T&E SpeciesReport[1Nov2012]

Above are links to the Endangered Species list and 2012 report for the Plains Southcap pipeline.

The 2012 Endangered Species  survey of the proposed pipeline route found 277 Gopher tortoise burrows in 19 clusters, (aka pods).  They propose to avoid the gopher tortoise burrows by drilling the pipeline under the burrows.

Questions from US. If you have answers, please provide.

What are the specifications of the pipeline itself and who is providing installation oversight?

How many pipelines are underneath Mobile River? How many pipelines are above the bridge?

Who is receiving the tar sands? Where is it going?

How many tank farms and where?

What are the principles in ARC?

If we succeed in re-routing pipeline, will a new public hearing be required? If so, we need to request it be held in Mobile, not Montgomery

Tell us more about Mobile Industrial Development Board promotion?

What about air quality? What are the emissions from the tank farms?

Has an archaeological assessment been done on the pipeline?

What is the volume by rail now? What is proposed once pipeline complete?

What is the history of leakage in these systems?



Questions raised post meeting

What is the potential danger of the train that carries the tar sand and what would be the evacuation range should a spill occur?

What is the purpose of the Alabama Public Service Commissioner?

Who owns the GMO terminal?

Can we change the rules of the PSC so they are required to notify local governments and have public meetings in the cities affected by their rulings?

Please create an email base to share updates from connie Hudson and the City/County officials as they learn what is happing regarding permitting and public hearings

Please explain a better distinction between the pipeline project to clarify path and course of action.

Would like a copy of Corps Nationwide permit.